🎉 Hey Gate Square friends! Non-stop perks and endless excitement—our hottest posting reward events are ongoing now! The more you post, the more you win. Don’t miss your exclusive goodies! 🚀
🆘 #Gate 2025 Semi-Year Community Gala# | Square Content Creator TOP 10
Only 1 day left! Your favorite creator is one vote away from TOP 10. Interact on Square to earn Votes—boost them and enter the prize draw. Prizes: iPhone 16 Pro Max, Golden Bull sculpture, Futures Vouchers!
Details 👉 https://www.gate.com/activities/community-vote
1️⃣ #Show My Alpha Points# | Share your Alpha points & gains
Post your
⸻
🗣️ Community Discussion Focus
1. Users appreciate the "invisibility of transactions".
Analysis: This indicates that many users affirm Anoma's privacy protection mechanism, considering its "invisible transactions" to be an important advantage.
2. Deep Dialogue on Privacy Design Initiated by Daniella
Analysis: The user wishes to further explore the details of Anoma's privacy mechanisms, indicating a push within the community for a technical analysis of privacy design.
🧐 Discussion of technical issues
Although no vulnerabilities or attacks were reported yesterday, several subtle questions have been raised in the community regarding Anoma's privacy architecture:
• Definition of "invisible transactions": Some users have raised questions about whether all transaction fields are hidden and which metadata may still be exposed.
•Trade-off between privacy and performance: Some people are concerned whether achieving privacy protection will affect user experience and on-chain performance.
•Comparison with other ZK projects: Many users compare Anoma's anonymity mechanism with other similar projects, discussing its advantages and potential shortcomings.