📢 Gate廣場獨家活動: #PUBLIC创作大赛# 正式開啓!
參與 Gate Launchpool 第 297 期 — PublicAI (PUBLIC),並在 Gate廣場發布你的原創內容,即有機會瓜分 4,000 枚 $PUBLIC 獎勵池!
🎨 活動時間
2025年8月18日 10:00 – 2025年8月22日 16:00 (UTC)
📌 參與方式
在 Gate廣場發布與 PublicAI (PUBLIC) 或當前 Launchpool 活動相關的原創內容
內容需不少於 100 字(可爲分析、教程、創意圖文、測評等)
添加話題: #PUBLIC创作大赛#
帖子需附帶 Launchpool 參與截圖(如質押記錄、領取頁面等)
🏆 獎勵設置(總計 4,000 枚 $PUBLIC)
🥇 一等獎(1名):1,500 $PUBLIC
🥈 二等獎(3名):每人 500 $PUBLIC
🥉 三等獎(5名):每人 200 $PUBLIC
📋 評選標準
內容質量(相關性、清晰度、創意性)
互動熱度(點讚、評論)
含有 Launchpool 參與截圖的帖子將優先考慮
📄 注意事項
所有內容須爲原創,嚴禁抄襲或虛假互動
獲獎用戶需完成 Gate廣場實名認證
Gate 保留本次活動的最終解釋權
Judge pushes jury to end Storm trial after days of gridlock
After four days of deliberations, jurors in the Roman Storm trial told the court they remain deadlocked on some charges, prompting the use of an Allen charge to encourage further discussion.
An Allen charge, sometimes called a “dynamite charge,” is a special instruction a judge gives to a deadlocked jury, urging them to re-examine their positions and attempt to reach a unanimous verdict.
According to court reports on Wednesday by Inner City Press, Storm’s lawyer Brian Klein opposed the charge, arguing that the jury had made it clear a unanimous verdict was unlikely and instead urged the court to consider accepting a partial verdict.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla sided with prosecutors, who preferred to push for continued deliberations rather than accept a partial verdict, with Assistant US attorney Thane Arad saying, “Let’s cross that bridge when we get there.”
The move keeps the trial alive and delays a potential mistrial, but also highlights the jury’s deep divisions over key aspects of the government’s case.
Related: SEC’s Peirce defends transaction privacy as Tornado Cash verdict looms
Tornado Cash trial verdict could set precedent for crypto developer liability
Storm, co-founder of the Ethereum-based mixer Tornado Cash, is accused of conspiring to launder over $1 billion in illicit funds, including money tied to hackers from North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Prosecutors argue he actively promoted the tool to criminals and ignored warnings about its misuse.
The defense claims Storm wrote open-source code and had no control over how it was used, raising broader questions about liability for software developers in decentralized systems.
The case has significant implications for crypto developers and the liability boundaries for writing decentralized software. If convicted on all counts and given the maximum penalties, Storm could face up to 45 years in prison.
Legal Panel: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in stablecoin fight